On February 18, 2026, early career researchers of the Ghent Centre for Buddhist Studies participated in a meeting with Aike Rots, Professor of East Asian Religions at the University of Oslo. The discussion was moderated by GCBS member Dr. Paride Stortini. Professor Rots introduced his current and upcoming externally funded projects, including the ERC Consolidator Grant project Maritime Goddesses: Transnational Connections, Blue Environments, and Ritual Care in East and Southeast Asia (MARGO; 2026–2031), and Coastal Lives in Flux: Environmental Crisis, Resistance, and Ritual Innovation Across Asia (CLiF; 2026–2030), funded by the Norwegian Research Council (FRIPRO). Earlier in his career, he was awarded an ERC Starting Grant for the project Whales of Power: Aquatic Mammals, Devotional Practices, and Environmental Change in Maritime East Asia (WhoP; 2019–2025), which is now resulting in a monograph. He is also the author of Shinto, Nature and Ideology in Contemporary Japan: Making Sacred Forests (Bloomsbury, 2017).
Drawing on his extensive experience with competitive funding, Professor Rots shared practical advice on writing strong grant proposals, especially for applicants to the European Research Council grants and Marie Skłodowska-Curie postdoctoral fellowships. He noted that one common pitfall is that proposals can become too heavy with theory or specialized jargon, making it difficult for reviewers to clearly grasp the core idea of the project. Clear and straightforward language helps reviewers quickly understand what the project is about and why it matters. He also encouraged applicants to make sure they are proposing a project they truly want to carry out and can realistically complete within the given timeframe.
Professor Rots further emphasized the importance of being concrete about how time and funding will be used. A strong proposal should clearly describe planned activities, such as research tasks, collaboration with PhD students or postdoctoral researchers, fieldwork, and publication strategies, including open-access dissemination where relevant. For individual fellowships in particular, it is crucial to demonstrate a good fit with the host institution and supervisors, and to explain how both sides will benefit from the collaboration. He also suggested reading successful proposals when possible and politely asking colleagues for advice, while respecting confidentiality.
The meeting concluded with an extended Q&A session, during which participants discussed their own project ideas and raised practical questions about application procedures. The exchange provided valuable insights and inspiration for researchers preparing future grant applications.
